On 31/08/16 17:35, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
> The MIPS based xilfpga platform has the following IRQ structure
>
> Peripherals --> xilinx_intcontroller -> mips_cpu_int controller
>
> Add support for the driver to chain the irq handler
>
> Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> V2 -> V3
> Reused existing parent node instead of finding again.
> Cleanup up handler based on review
>
> V1 -> V2
>
> No change
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> index cb69241..30bb084 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> /* No one else should require these constants, so define them locally here. */
> #define ISR 0x00 /* Interrupt Status Register */
> @@ -154,11 +155,23 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xintc_irq_domain_ops = {
> .map = xintc_map,
> };
>
> +static void xil_intc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + u32 pending;
> +
> + do {
> + pending = get_irq();
> + if (pending == -1U)
> + break;
> + generic_handle_irq(pending);
> + } while (true);
> +}
> +
> static int __init xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node *intc,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> u32 nr_irq;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, irq;
> struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc;
>
> irqc = kzalloc(sizeof(*irqc), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -211,6 +224,15 @@ static int __init xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node *intc,
> root_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc, nr_irq, &xintc_irq_domain_ops,
> irqc);
>
> + if (parent) {
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(intc, 0);
> + if (irq)
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq,
> + xil_intc_irq_handler,
> + root_domain);
> +
> + }
> +
> irq_set_default_host(root_domain);
>
> return 0;
>
This doesn't seem right. You've now overridden the xintc_irqc pointer,
so I don't know how you can still process interrupts once you've
discovered a secondary interrupt controller. You've also allocated a
second root_domain, changed the default domain to point to the secondary
controller...
Have you tested this code? Or am I missing something obvious?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
