Re: [PATCH 06/10] MIPS: pm-cps: Use MIPS standard lightweight ordering barrier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:36:26PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> 
> The code previously had 0x10 as a magic number, this patch just replaces
> that with a #defined name. The value is documented in the MIPS64 instruction
> set manual, https://imgtec.com/?do-download=4302, table 6.5.
> 
> This sync type has been standard since MIPSr2. That document also states
> that "If an implementation does not use one of these non-zero values to
> define a different synchronization behavior, then that non-zero value of
> stype must act the same as stype zero completion barrier." As such,
> stype_ordering can always be set to this sync type rather than setting it
> only for certain CPUs.

Right. We all had a bunch of fun trying to decode that manual a while
back, and IIRC were left with a bunch of questions on what it all meant
in 3+ CPU scenarios.

In anycase, not sure why I was Cc'ed to this patch, but in general I
have low confidence in barrier patches that lack lots of detail. And the
code in question has woefully inadequate comments:

                /* Ordering barrier */
                uasm_i_sync(&p, stype_ordering);

Order what against what and why? Is my first question. A comment really
should explain.

In any case, you've removed the only (runtime) assignment to the
variable, it can become 'const'.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux