On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:53:53 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Egads! OK, I see why this is a mess. :-) > > I guess we should be creating the metadata from the syscall tables > instead of from the syscall definitions, but I guess that's currently > a nasty per-arch mess. Yep. > > Could we at least have an array of (arch, nr) instead of just an array > of nrs in the metadata? I guess I'm not following you on what would be used for "arch". -- Steve
