On 08/26, Paul Burton wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/img,boston-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/img,boston-clock.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c01ea60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/img,boston-clock.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +Binding for Imagination Technologies MIPS Boston clock sources.
> +
> +This binding uses the common clock binding[1].
> +
> +[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Should be "img,boston-clock".
> +- #clock-cells : Should be set to 1.
> + Values available for clock consumers can be found in the header file:
> + <dt-bindings/clock/boston-clock.h>
> +- regmap : Phandle to the Boston platform register system controller.
> + This should contain a phandle to the system controller node covering the
> + platform registers provided by the Boston board.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + clk_boston: clock {
> + compatible = "img,boston-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + regmap = <&plat_regs>;
Isn't syscon more standard than regmap as the property name? Is
there a binding for the plat_regs device? Is there any reason the
clks can't be populated in that syscon driver?
> + };
> +
> + uart0: uart@17ffe000 {
> + /* ... */
> + clocks = <&clk_boston BOSTON_CLK_SYS>;
> + };
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
