On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:44:01AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 17:30:18 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Looks good, I'm just unsure about "multi_v8_defconfig", this does not > > > exist. Do you mean multi_v5_defconfig? > > > Ah yes, multi_v8_defconfig does not exist actually. > > Ok, can you include multi_v5_defconfig than? OK, done. > I see you have one named "arm-arm5", which may be the same. Yes, looks so -- it's provided by someone else long time ago. > > > I also wonder if you include 'randconfig' builds for some architectures. > > > I have patches for all remaining errors and warnings that I see with > > > ARM randconfig builds today. Not all of them are merged yet, but I could > > > probably come up with a file to be used as input to KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG > > > to eliminate the known-broken configurations, if you are interested. > > > > If the are mostly ready for upstream, it may be easier to wait until > > upstream randconfig works just fine for ARM. > > I have around 130 patches for warnings that I'm submitting at the moment, but > there are a couple of really tricky ones that I don't currently have > a good plan for: > > - in some configurations, you end up without any boards selected, hitting > an #error in the final link > - ARMv3 support in gcc is rather broken and causes internal compiler errors > among other things > - the old ELF format (OABI) doesn't work in some cases > - GCOV_PROFILE_ALL causes problems that need to be debugged > - XIP_KERNEL sometimes causes kallsyms to fail > - not all platforms implement the complete clk API, if they don't > use CONFIG_COMMON_CLK (I have patch for that we can probably merge) The robot may explicitly enable/disable some CONFIG_* after randconfig to workaround known problems. > - CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET needs to be entered manually to be a number > in 'make config' That's a problem for auto tests. > - same for DEBUG_LL Thanks, Fengguang
