On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > - little-endian; > > + native-endian; > But native-endian == big-endian usually for bcm63xx, so is this > actually a bugfix? Yes, it's buggy - in v4.5-rc1 we respect the endianness so big endian just won't work, prior to that this was a hack around another bug which was done rather than reporting it so it "just" results in a DT that's obviously incorrect. This local hack has been causing a lot of problems.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
