Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] sparc/compat: Provide an accurate in_compat_syscall implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:29:51 +0100

> Could you please add a comment about where 0x110 comes from.
> I at least failed to track this down.

Frankly I'm fine with this.  Someone who understands sparc64 can look
at the trap table around entry 0x110 and see:

tl0_resv10e:	BTRAP(0x10e) BTRAP(0x10f)
tl0_linux32:	LINUX_32BIT_SYSCALL_TRAP
tl0_oldlinux64:	LINUX_64BIT_SYSCALL_TRAP




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux