On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:49:48 +0000
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:34:56 +0100
> Alban Bedel <albeu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <albeu@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/ath79/irq.c | 81
> > ++------------------------ arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ath79.h
> > | 1 + drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-cpu.c | 97
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 105
> > insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-cpu.c
> >
[...]
> > +asmlinkage void plat_irq_dispatch(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pending;
> > + int irq;
> > +
> > + pending = read_c0_status() & read_c0_cause() & ST0_IM;
> > +
> > + if (!pending) {
> > + spurious_interrupt();
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pending >>= CAUSEB_IP;
> > + while (pending) {
> > + irq = fls(pending) - 1;
> > + if (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_wb_chan) && irq_wb_chan[irq] != -1)
> > + ath79_ddr_wb_flush(irq_wb_chan[irq]);
> > + do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + irq);
>
> I'm rather unfamiliar with the MIPS IRQ handling, but I'm vaguely
> surprised by the lack of domain. How do you unsure that the IRQ space
> used here doesn't clash with the one created in your "misc" irqchip?
This driver extend the irq-mips-cpu driver which take care of setting up
a legacy domain starting from MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE for these interrupts. I
don't find this very nice either, but this patch is about moving the
code out of arch/mips, so I tried to minimize unrelated changes.
Alban
