Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@xxxxxxx> L: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo
