On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:20:42 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:06:30PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On s390 read_barrier_depends, smp_read_barrier_depends
> > smp_store_mb(), smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic match the
> > asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in
> > asm-generic/barrier.h instead.
> >
> > This is in preparation to refactoring this code area.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 10 ++--------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > index 7ffd0b1..c358c31 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > @@ -30,14 +30,6 @@
> > #define smp_rmb() rmb()
> > #define smp_wmb() wmb()
> >
> > -#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
> > -#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
> > -
> > -#define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> > -#define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
>
> As per:
>
> lkml.kernel.org/r/20150921112252.3c2937e1@mschwide
>
> s390 should change this to barrier() instead of smp_mb() and hence
> should not use the generic versions.
Yes, we wanted to simplify this. Thanks for the reminder, I'll queue
a patch.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
