On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> --- >> Ralf: please ACK this so I can take it through the GPIO tree. >> BTW: would be nice if the MIPS GPIO drivers could move down >> to drivers/gpio in the long run. > > Is there a specific reason? I have no objections to moving it, but > on the other hand I also like that (in this case) most/all chip-specific > code is grouped together and not scattered around the tree. Here is a reason. This patch series. If I could just change all that and have the dependencies inside the GPIO tree, refactoring struggles would be so much easier. Yours, Linus Walleij
