On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:30:40 +0000
Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 07/12/15 22:26, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > ->ecc_layout is not used by any board file. Kill this field to avoid any
> > confusion. New boards are encouraged to use the default ECC layout defined
> > in NAND core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h | 2 --
> > drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c | 3 ---
> > 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h
> > index 79cff26..398733e 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h
> > @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ struct jz_nand_platform_data {
> > int num_partitions;
> > struct mtd_partition *partitions;
> >
> > - struct nand_ecclayout *ecc_layout;
> > -
> > unsigned char banks[JZ_NAND_NUM_BANKS];
> >
> > void (*ident_callback)(struct platform_device *, struct nand_chip *,
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c
> > index 5a99a93..c4fe446 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c
> > @@ -446,9 +446,6 @@ static int jz_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > chip->ecc.bytes = 9;
> > chip->ecc.strength = 4;
> >
> > - if (pdata)
> > - chip->ecc.layout = pdata->ecc_layout;
> > -
> > chip->chip_delay = 50;
> > chip->cmd_ctrl = jz_nand_cmd_ctrl;
> > chip->select_chip = jz_nand_select_chip;
> >
>
> Is there a typo in this commit title? The JZ4740 and JZ4770 have quite
> different NAND controller interfaces, so I don't think that the JZ4740
> driver will support the JZ4770.
Yes, it's a typo, I meant jz4740, I'll fix my commit message
accordingly.
Thanks,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
