Hi Boris,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c b/drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c
> index cb9d5ab..967d50a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c
> @@ -42,23 +42,29 @@ static inline struct spinand_state *mtd_to_state(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> static int enable_hw_ecc;
> static int enable_read_hw_ecc;
>
> -static struct nand_ecclayout spinand_oob_64 = {
> - .eccbytes = 24,
> - .eccpos = {
> - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
> - 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
> - 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
> - 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, },
> - .oobfree = {
> - {.offset = 8,
> - .length = 8},
> - {.offset = 24,
> - .length = 8},
> - {.offset = 40,
> - .length = 8},
> - {.offset = 56,
> - .length = 8},
> - }
> +static int spinand_oob_64_eccpos(struct mtd_info *mtd, int eccbyte)
> +{
> + if (eccbyte > 23)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + return ((eccbyte / 6) * 16) + 1;
Are you sure this is correct? My reading of this is that we'd get 1
for eccbytes 0 through 5.
Would
((eccbyte / 6) * 16) + (eccbyte % 6) + 1
be more correct?
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
