On 10/25/2015 10:16 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> To support (extract) SPROM on Broadcom ARM devices we should separate
> SPROM code and make it a separated module. We won't want to export
> bcm47xx_fill_sprom symbol so we should support SoC SPROM in the standard
> fallback function and then modify ssb to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/bcm47xx/sprom.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/sprom.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/sprom.c
> index 2d5c7a7..e19c1b9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/sprom.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/sprom.c
> @@ -610,14 +610,18 @@ static int bcm47xx_get_sprom_ssb(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out)
> {
> char prefix[10];
>
> - if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI) {
> + switch (bus->bustype) {
> + case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
> + bcm47xx_fill_sprom(out, NULL, false);
> + return 0;
> + case SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI:
> memset(out, 0, sizeof(struct ssb_sprom));
> snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "pci/%u/%u/",
> bus->host_pci->bus->number + 1,
> PCI_SLOT(bus->host_pci->devfn));
> bcm47xx_fill_sprom(out, prefix, false);
> return 0;
> - } else {
> + default:
> pr_warn("Unable to fill SPROM for given bustype.\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
