Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio/xilinx: enable for MIPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/14/2015 06:54 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 05:57PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 10/14/2015 05:18 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 01:51PM +0100, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>>>> MIPSfpga uses the axi gpio controller. Enable the driver for MIPS.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>>>> index 8949b3f..58e9afd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ config GPIO_XGENE_SB
>>>>  
>>>>  config GPIO_XILINX
>>>>  	tristate "Xilinx GPIO support"
>>>> -	depends on OF_GPIO && (PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARCH_ZYNQ || X86)
>>>> +	depends on OF_GPIO && (PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARCH_ZYNQ || X86 || MIPS)
>>>
>>> Hmm, in general, this driver is hopefully generic enough that it doesn't
>>> have any real architecture dependencies. And I suspect, we want to
>>> enable this driver for ARM64 for ZynqMP soon too. Should we probably
>>> drop these arch dependencies completely? It seems to become quite a long list.
>>
>> I've been thinking about this a while ago. This is certainly not the only
>> driver affected by this problem. But the thing is people always complain if
>> new symbols become visable in Kconfig that don't apply to their platform.
>>
>> Maybe we should introduce a HAS_REPROGRAMABLE_LOGIC (or similar) feature
>> Kconfig symbol and let platforms which have a FPGA select it and let drivers
>> for FPGA peripherals depend on it.
> 
> Sounds like a good idea to me. But, does that work for all use-cases.
> E.g. if you plug some PCIe card with an FPGA into an x86(_64) machine.
> That would allow you to use those drivers, but I'm not sure how that
> could pull in the new config symbol.

Hm, right. We could also make it a user-selectable config symbol. In that
case you only need to disable one symbol when you don't have FPGA support
rather than one for each driver. Although I'm not quite sure where to put
such a symbol.

- Lars





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux