From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit 1d62d737555e1378eb62a8bba26644f7d97139d2 upstream. p->thread.user_cpus_allowed is zero-initialized and is only filled on the first sched_setaffinity call. To avoid adding overhead in the task initialization codepath, simply OR the returned mask in sched_getaffinity with p->cpus_allowed. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10740/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> --- arch/mips/kernel/mips-mt-fpaff.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/mips-mt-fpaff.c b/arch/mips/kernel/mips-mt-fpaff.c index cb098628aee8..ca16964a2b5e 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/mips-mt-fpaff.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/mips-mt-fpaff.c @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ asmlinkage long mipsmt_sys_sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, unsigned int len, unsigned long __user *user_mask_ptr) { unsigned int real_len; - cpumask_t mask; + cpumask_t allowed, mask; int retval; struct task_struct *p; @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ asmlinkage long mipsmt_sys_sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, unsigned int len, if (retval) goto out_unlock; - cpumask_and(&mask, &p->thread.user_cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask); + cpumask_or(&allowed, &p->thread.user_cpus_allowed, &p->cpus_allowed); + cpumask_and(&mask, &allowed, cpu_active_mask); out_unlock: read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); -- 2.5.0
