* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:38:25 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:24:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > 110254 bytes saved, shrinking the kernel by a whopping 0.17%. > > > Thoughts? > > > > Sounds fine to me. > > OK, I'll clean it up a bit, check that each uninlining actually makes > sense and then I'll see how it goes. > > > > > > > I'll merge these 5 patches for 4.3. That means I'll release them into > > > linux-next after 4.2 is released. > > > > So you only add for-4.3 code to -next after 4.2 is odd? Isn't thast the > > wrong way around? > > Linus will be releasing 4.2 in 1-2 weeks and until then, linux-next is > supposed to contain only 4.2 material. Once 4.2 is released, > linux-next is open for 4.3 material. Isn't that off by one? I.e. shouldn't this be: > I'll merge these 5 patches for 4.4. That means I'll release them into > linux-next after 4.2 is released. > > [...] > > Linus will be releasing 4.2 in 1-2 weeks and until then, linux-next is supposed > to contain only 4.3 material. Once 4.2 is released and the 4.3 merge window > opens, linux-next is open for 4.4 material. ? Thanks, Ingo
