Re: [PATCH 4/5] MIPS: ath79: Fix the PCI memory size and offset of window 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Alban Bedel <albeu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The define AR71XX_PCI_MEM_SIZE miss one window, there is 7 windows,
> not 6. To make things clearer, and allow simpler code, derive
> AR71XX_PCI_MEM_SIZE from the newly introduced AR71XX_PCI_WIN_COUNT
> and AR71XX_PCI_WIN_SIZE.
>
> The define AR71XX_PCI_WIN7_OFFS also add a typo, fix it.

I think this will break PCI on ar71xx.

>
> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <albeu@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ar71xx_regs.h | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ar71xx_regs.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ar71xx_regs.h
> index aa3800c..e2669a8 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ar71xx_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ar71xx_regs.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,9 @@
>  #define AR71XX_RESET_SIZE      0x100
>
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_MEM_BASE    0x10000000
> -#define AR71XX_PCI_MEM_SIZE    0x07000000
> +#define AR71XX_PCI_WIN_COUNT   8
> +#define AR71XX_PCI_WIN_SIZE    0x01000000
> +#define AR71XX_PCI_MEM_SIZE    (AR71XX_PCI_WIN_COUNT * AR71XX_PCI_WIN_SIZE)
>
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_WIN0_OFFS   0x10000000
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_WIN1_OFFS   0x11000000
> @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_WIN4_OFFS   0x14000000
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_WIN5_OFFS   0x15000000
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_WIN6_OFFS   0x16000000
> -#define AR71XX_PCI_WIN7_OFFS   0x07000000
> +#define AR71XX_PCI_WIN7_OFFS   0x17000000

These values are used in exactly one place, for writing into the PCI
address space offset registers.
The 7th PCI window is a special one for accessing the configuration
space registers, which requires to be set to 0x07000000 for that
purpose. So by changing this value you likely break access to these
values.

>
>  #define AR71XX_PCI_CFG_BASE    \
>         (AR71XX_PCI_MEM_BASE + AR71XX_PCI_WIN7_OFFS + 0x10000)

Also this macro would now be wrong, and calculate a wrong address.


Regards
Jonas





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux