On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:16:53PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote: >> >>> This series adds support for the system pin and GPIO controller on the IMG >>> Pistachio SoC. Pistachio's system pin controller manages 99 pins, 90 of >>> which are MFIOs which can be muxed between multiple functions or used >>> as GPIOs. The GPIO control for the 90 MFIOs is broken up into banks >>> of 16. Pistachio also has a second pin controller, the RPU pin controller, >>> which will be supported by a future patchset through an extension to this >>> driver. >>> >>> Test on an IMG Pistachio BuB. Based on mips-for-linux-next which inluces my >>> series adding Pistachio platform support [1]. A branch with this series is >>> available at [2]. >> >> Does this mean you want me to funnel this through the MIPS tree? If so, >> could I have an Ack from the maintainers? > > Linus mentioned in v1 that if the only dependency was a Kconfig symbol > that he could take it through his tree. I'm fine either way, though > it would be slightly more convenient for it to go through the MIPS > tree. Linus? I took 1/3 into pinctrl since it touched my core documentation and actually even had to be slightly rebased. I will look at 2/3 and 3/3 and provide ACK if I think they are all right. Yours, Linus Walleij
