On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:29:55 +0100 > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>, Ralf Baechle > <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux MIPS <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ezequiel > Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Hartley > <james.hartley@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Bresticker > <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'd like this to go through the MIPS tree with > > Linus'/Alex's ACKs if possible. > > Why? It will only help creating merge conflicts. > There seem to be no compile-related dependencies, just Kconfig > symbols, so patches using this can go in orthogonally. It would mean all the bits for Pistachio support go through a single tree which simplifies testing and possibly fixing significantly. The conflict potencial for this series is fairly low, I think. Ralf
