Hi Andrew, On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 09:56 -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the > > code (which suggests that a modular build is also possible). > > Nearly all of the pinctrl drivers (with the exception of qcom and > intel) are like this. Could be, I didn't check. Perhaps copy and pasting is to blame. (Copy and pasting appears to me a sensible way to start writing a new driver). > They use a bool Kconfig symbol but they are > written so that they could be built as a module in the future. Did I miss a comment or a remark in the commit explanation that explains this? Anyhow, if that modular future is not expected to be the near future, can you perhaps carry these lines in a branch called, say pinctrl-modular? Thanks, Paul Bolle
