On 03/05/2015 01:59 PM, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > The IRQF_DISABLED is a NOOP and has been scheduled for removal since > Linux v2.6.36 by commit 6932bf37bed4 ("genirq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED from > core code"). > > According to commit e58aa3d2d0cc ("genirq: Run irq handlers with > interrupts disabled") running IRQ handlers with interrupts enabled can > cause stack overflows when the interrupt line of the issuing device is > still active. > > This patch ends the grace period for IRQF_DISABLED (i.e., SA_INTERRUPT > in older versions of Linux) and removes the definition and all remaining > usages of this flag. > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > The bigger hunk in Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt is removed entirely > as IRQF_DISABLED is gone now; the usage in older kernel versions > (including the old SA_INTERRUPT flag) should be discouraged. The > trouble of using IRQF_SHARED is a general problem and not specific to > any driver. > > I left the reference in Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt untouched since > it has already been removed in linux-next by commit b0e1ee8e1405 > ("MSI-HOWTO.txt: remove reference on IRQF_DISABLED"). > > All remaining references are changelogs that I suggest to keep. While you're at it: having '0x0' as a value for the irq flags looks a bit silly, and makes you wonder what the parameter is for. I would rather like to have #define IRQF_NONE 0x0 and use it for these cases. That way the scope of that parameter is clear. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)