On 04/02/2015 12:04, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 11:19 +0100, John Crispin wrote: >> On 04/02/2015 11:13, Paul Bolle wrote: >>> Is SOC_MT7621 still being worked on? >> >> yes we dropped the series as it collided with the gic rework that >> chromiun.org was working on. i hope to push it during the next merge >> window. the 1004k support has just been flaky till now as there was >> never any real silicon to test it on. the chromium people really did a >> good job at making the gic code nicer. > > Thanks for explaining this. Unless SOC_MT7621 takes a long time to land > in linux-next I won't be bothering you again about this. (I think I'll > use "by the end of the v3.20 series" as a definition of a long time.) > >> quite an impressive Cc list you have there > > Yes, that's the way it works with problems that span two (or more) > subsystems (in this case watchdog and MIPS). Actually, much longer CC > lists are used regularly on lkml. > > Thanks! > > > Paul Bolle > i think wim should just drop it and we leave it in openwrt with the other 1/2 million patches that we have. i prefer to upstream the stuff without feeling pressured to hurry up, that kills the fun. @Wim, can you drop the patch please ? John
