* Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> [150202 09:50]:
> Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-02-02 08:12:37)
> >
> > [ 10.568206] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 10.568206] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:925 clk_disable+0x28/0x34()
> > [ 10.568237] Modules linked in:
> > [ 10.568237] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202 #2037
> > [ 10.568237] Hardware name: Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)
> > [ 10.568267] [<c0015bdc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001222c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> > [ 10.568267] [<c001222c>] (show_stack) from [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
> > [ 10.568267] [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8)
> > [ 10.568298] [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
> > [ 10.568298] [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c04c1ffc>] (clk_disable+0x28/0x34)
> > [ 10.568328] [<c04c1ffc>] (clk_disable) from [<c0025b3c>] (_disable_clocks+0x18/0x68)
> > [ 10.568328] [<c0025b3c>] (_disable_clocks) from [<c0026f14>] (_idle+0x10c/0x214)
> > [ 10.568328] [<c0026f14>] (_idle) from [<c0855fac>] (_setup+0x338/0x410)
> > [ 10.568359] [<c0855fac>] (_setup) from [<c0027360>] (omap_hwmod_for_each+0x34/0x60)
> > [ 10.568359] [<c0027360>] (omap_hwmod_for_each) from [<c08563c4>] (__omap_hwmod_setup_all+0x30/0x40)
> > [ 10.568389] [<c08563c4>] (__omap_hwmod_setup_all) from [<c0008a04>] (do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1dc)
> > [ 10.568389] [<c0008a04>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0848ea0>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2d0)
> > [ 10.568420] [<c0848ea0>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c05cdab8>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec)
> > [ 10.568420] [<c05cdab8>] (kernel_init) from [<c000e790>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
> > [ 10.568420] ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa211 ]---
For reference, the above is line 992 in clk-next.
> This looks like mis-matched enable/disable calls. We now have unique
> struct clk pointers for every call to clk_get. I haven't yet looked
> through the hwmod code but I have a feeling that we're doing something
> like this:
>
> /* enable clock */
> my_clk = clk_get(...);
> clk_prepare_enable(my_clk);
> clk_put(my_clk);
>
> /* do some work */
> do_work();
>
> /* disable clock */
> my_clk = clk_get(...);
> clk_disable_unprepare(my_clk);
> clk_put(my_clk);
>
> The above pattern no longer works since my_clk will be two different
> unique pointers, but it really should be one stable pointer across the
> whole usage of the clk. E.g:
>
> /* enable clock */
> my_clk = clk_get(...);
> clk_prepare_enable(my_clk);
>
> /* do some work */
> do_work();
>
> /* disable clock */
> clk_disable_unprepare(my_clk);
> clk_put(my_clk);
>
> Again, I haven't looked through the code, so the above is just an
> educated guess.
>
> Anyways I am testing with an OMAP4460 Panda ES and I didn't see the
> above. Is there a test you are running to get this?
Just booting 4430-sdp with omap2plus_defconfig. And git bisect
points to 59cf3fcf9baf ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct
clk instances") as you already guessed.
> > [ 10.568450] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 10.568450] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c:436 omap3_noncore_dpll_enable+0xdc/0
> > x10c()
> > [ 10.568450] Modules linked in:
> > [ 10.568481] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202 #2037
> > [ 10.568481] Hardware name: Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)
> > [ 10.568481] [<c0015bdc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001222c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> > [ 10.568511] [<c001222c>] (show_stack) from [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
> > [ 10.568511] [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8)
> > [ 10.568511] [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
> > [ 10.568542] [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0035800>] (omap3_noncore_dpll_enable+0xdc/0x10c)
> > [ 10.568542] [<c0035800>] (omap3_noncore_dpll_enable) from [<c04c0a10>] (clk_core_enable+0x60/0x9c)
> > [ 10.568572] [<c04c0a10>] (clk_core_enable) from [<c04c09f0>] (clk_core_enable+0x40/0x9c)
> > [ 10.568572] ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa212 ]---
> > ...
>
> This is the same issue discussed already in this thread[0]. Feedback
> from Tero & Paul on how to handle it would be nice.
Yes that one is a separate issue.
> Please let me know if anything else breaks for you.
Also off-idle on omap3 seems to be broken by commit 59cf3fcf9baf.
Regards,
Tony
