> That's news for me. I thought they are silently ignored. Do you have an > example of such a warning? Not really. It was just assumption. It seems you are right, they are just ignored silently. But item 2 is still relevant and it was actually confused me when I tried to figure out MTD configuration for my platform. Anyway, garbage should be taken out from time to time. > Seems like the kind of change that can only be reviewed by a script. Good point. Because these patches were done by script to start with. Anyway, I reviewed result patches manually to be completely sure. You can write verifying script though, if you need to, it wouldn't take more than 2 minutes (it takes one-liner, actually). > I seem to remember Greg stating that defconfig files are on their way > out. Did I remember that correctly? Maybe they are. But they still in place, and why it's so, we should maintain them up-to-date. Ideally, this kind of work should be done by someone who introduces changes into Kconfig files. So I just fixed that oversight.
