On 12/12/2014 01:54 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 11/12/14 13:22, Ralf Baechle wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19:53AM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Kevin Cernekee (15): >>>> Documentation: DT: Add entries for BCM3384 and its peripherals >>> >>>> MIPS: bcm3384: Initial commit of bcm3384 platform support >>>> MAINTAINERS: Add entry for BCM33xx cable chips >>> >>> Hi Ralf, >>> >>> Could we drop/revert these three patches for now, and then use the >>> "BMIPS Generic target V4" patch series to support BCM3384? The BMIPS >>> Generic series incorporates a great deal of helpful feedback from Arnd >>> and others, and it also runs on 5+ other chips. >>> >>> It is OK if it isn't merged until 3.20+. No rush. >> >> Too late - the pull request to Linus is out. > > Ralf, you applied the patches without email notice, Kevin asked you to > drop them way before sending a pull request while he was posting v2-3-4 > of his patch set, and now he has to deal with potential reverts, this is > counter productive. > > I do not see the MIPS pull request anywhere in public email archives, so > we could not even say "wait" before this went out to Linus. > -- > Florian > I am a little confused as well. Sometimes the pull requests appear on LMO, some other times they don't. Would it be possible to CC LMO every time a pull request is sent to Linus so we have time to review it (more pair of eyes is not a bad thing) and comment on it if needed? -- markos
