Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] tty: Fallback to use dynamic major number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:53:58PM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
>> From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This email bounces, so I'm going to have to reject this patch.  I can't
> accept a patch from a "fake" person, let alone something that touches
> core code like this.
>
> Sorry, I can't accept anything in this series then.

Oops, guess I probably should have updated his address after the V1
emails bounced...

Before I send a new version, what do you think about the overall
approach?  Should we try to make serial8250 coexist with the other
"ttyS / major 4 / minor 64" drivers (possibly at the expense of
compatibility) or is it better to start with a simpler, cleaner driver
like serial/pxa?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux