Re: [PATCH V2 22/22] MIPS: Add multiplatform BMIPS target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 17 November 2014 11:39:02 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday 17 November 2014 09:01:02 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> >> > If you wanted to do that however, starting with BMIPS you'd have
> >> > to make it possible to define a new platform without the
> >> > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ directory (this should be possible
> >> > already, so the hardest part is done), replace all global function
> >> > calls (arch_init_irq, prom_init, get_system_type,  ...) with generic
> >> > platform-independent implementations or wrappers around per-platform
> >> > callbacks, and move the Kconfig section for CONFIG_BMIPS_MULTIPLATFORM
> >> > outside of the "System type" choice statement.
> >>
> >> Right.  The other question is how much support for legacy non-DT
> >> bootloaders really belongs in a true multiplatform kernel, as this
> >> stuff gets hairy fast.
> >
> > Yes, that's why I suggested following PowerPC rather than ARM in this
> > regard.  If you move the boot loader abstraction into the decompressor
> > instead of the platform code, you can avoid a lot of the problems.
> 
> One possible complication: for BCM63xx/BCM7xxx (MIPS) there is no
> decompressor in the kernel.  The firmware loads an ELF image into
> memory and jumps directly to kernel_entry.
> 

Right, that complicates it a bit, but is there a reason why a decompressor
would be hard to do, or would be considered a bad thing?
There is already generic decompressor code in arch/mips/boot/compressed/
that I would assume you could use without firmware changes. Are you
worried about boot time overhead?

	Arnd





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux