On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:44:17PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > 2014-11-13 13:36 GMT-08:00 Andreas Herrmann > > <andreas.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > ehci-octeon driver used a 64-bit dma_mask. With removal of ehci-octeon > > > and usage of ehci-platform ehci dma_mask is now limited to 32 bits > > > (coerced in ehci_platform_probe). > > > > > > Provide a flag in ehci platform data to allow use of 64 bits for > > > dma_mask. > > > > Why not just allow enforcing an arbitrary DMA mask? > > I thought about that but as it's currently just 32 or 64 bits > a flag is sufficient. (At the moment I am not aware that > other ehci-platform devices would require something else.) > > I'll change the flag to a mask if desired. > Alan, what's your opinion about this? I'm not aware of any devices that need a different DMA mask either. Florian, do you have any reason for thinking such a thing might come along? Like Andreas, I don't mind making it more general if there's a good reason to do so. Alan Stern
