On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Use io{read,write}32be if the caller specified IRQ_GC_BE_IO when creating
>> the irqchip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I bisected a couple ARM boot failures in next-20141110 on atmel sama5 platforms down to
> this patch, though I'm not quite yet sure how it's causing the failure.
> I'm not getting any console output, so haven't been able to dig deeper
> yet. Maybe the atmel maintainers (Cc'd) can help dig.
>
> I've confirmed that reverting $SUBJECT patch (commit
> b79055952badbd73710685643bab44104f2509ea2) on top of next-20141110 gets
> things booting again.
>
> Also, it only happens with sama5_defconfig, not with multi_v7_defconfig.
In drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c I see:
ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, 32, 1, name,
handle_level_irq, 0, 0,
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE);
and IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE is (1 << 4), same as IRQ_GC_BE_IO.
Is it possible that the caller is passing values intended for
irq_chip->flags into a function expecting
irq_domain_chip_generic->gc_flags ?
