On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 10/27/2014 01:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > You're repeating yourself. Care to read the discussion about this from > > the last round of review again? > > OK, so here's a rewritten decoder. I think it's a lot more robust and > probably fixes a bug or two. This ends up saving ~70 lines of code out > of ~300 or so for the old patch. > > I'll include this in the next series, but I'm posting it early and often > to make sure I'm on the right track. Had a short glance. This looks really very well done! Thanks, tglx
