On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/29/2014 12:12 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote: >> >> +- reg : Base address and length of the GIC registers. >> > > Also except for sead3, the base address should be properly reported by the > hardware. The size is fixed (for a specific version of GIC at least - which > is also reported by the hardware). So it would be nice to make this > optional. Even though this is usually probable, I'd prefer to leave this as required, or at least "optional, but recommended". I don't have a very strong opinion on it though, but perhaps the device-tree folks do?
