On 22/10/2014 08:54, Eunbong Song wrote: > >> Hi Eubong, > >> one small question inline ... > >>> +void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool); +#define >>> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > >> What is the purpose of this define ? is this maybe a leftover from >> some regex/cleanups ? > > Hi John. > Actually, I just follow the same function of sparc architecture. > You can find this in arch/sparc/include/asm/irq_64.h as below > > void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool); > #define arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > > I guess this is used for conditional compile. > See below. > include/linux/nmi.h > #ifdef arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(true); > > return true; > } > static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(false); > return true; > } > #else > static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > return false; > } > static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > return false; > } > #endif > > Thanks. >> John > i don't see how this is required for conditional compiles. the code define a->a which is bogus i think. John