On 10/09/2014 01:24 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!@@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void) void machine_power_off(void) { + do_kernel_poweroff(); +poweroff -> power_off for consistency.Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately went with poweroff to distinguish poweroff handler functions from existing code, specifically kernel_power_off().That works for you, but once it is merged, it is ugly/confusing typo. Pavel
Ok, no problem, I'll change it. Guenter