On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 09:50:42AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Use the much more common pr_warn instead of pr_warning > with the goal of removing pr_warning eventually. While I agree that only one of pr_warn and pr_warning deserves to live picking pr_warning introduces another logic inconsistency - for each pr_<foo> function there is a KERN_<FOO> severity symbol. And that in this case is named KERN_WARNING, there's no KERN_WARN. Ralf
