Re: [PATCH 03/24] MIPS: Provide a generic plat_irq_dispatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

On 09/16/2014 12:51 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
For platforms which boot with device-tree or have correctly chained
all external interrupt controllers, a generic plat_irq_dispatch() can
be used.  Implement a plat_irq_dispatch() which simply handles all the
pending interrupts as reported by C0_Cause.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/mips/kernel/irq_cpu.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/irq_cpu.c b/arch/mips/kernel/irq_cpu.c
index ca98a9f..f17bd08 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/irq_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/irq_cpu.c
@@ -94,6 +94,21 @@ static struct irq_chip mips_mt_cpu_irq_controller = {
  	.irq_eoi	= unmask_mips_irq,
  };
+asmlinkage void __weak plat_irq_dispatch(void)
+{
+	unsigned long pending = read_c0_cause() & read_c0_status() & ST0_IM;
+	int irq;
+
+	if (!pending) {
+		spurious_interrupt();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	pending >>= CAUSEB_IP;
+	for_each_set_bit(irq, &pending, 8)
+		do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + irq);
+}
+

If I read the for_each_set_bit() macro correctly it'll iterate through the bits from least to most significant ones which is the reversed priority expected. Some platforms set timer interrupt to bit 7 which is should be the highest priority interrupt. Also when cpu_has_vint is set the hardware prioritirise from most significant to least significant bits so if plat_irq_dispatch() is used with set_vi_handler() it'll cause interrupts to be serviced in the wrong order.

Qais

  static int mips_cpu_intc_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
  			     irq_hw_number_t hw)
  {






[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux