> 在 2014年9月5日，18:47，Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道：
>
> Hello.
>
>> On 9/5/2014 2:10 PM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>
>> Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure
>> MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
>> index 71bd161..01781a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
> [...]
>> @@ -27,7 +27,17 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
>> return ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type);
>> }
>>
>> -void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +static void ppc_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> Shouldn't this function take IRQ # instead?
This function need to teardown all msi irqs of the pci dev, we should pass the pci dev as argument .
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
>> {
>> ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
>> }
>> +
>> +static struct msi_chip ppc_msi_chip = {
>> + .setup_irqs = ppc_setup_msi_irqs,
>> + .teardown_irqs = ppc_teardown_msi_irqs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct msi_chip *arch_find_msi_chip(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + return &ppc_msi_chip;
>> +}
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
