On 06/26/2014 12:28 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 06/26/2014 12:11 PM, Deng-Cheng Zhu wrote:
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Since all the files are in arch/mips/kvm/, there's no need of the prefixes
"kvm_" and "kvm_mips_".
I don't like this change.
It will leads me to confuse arch/mips/kvm/interrupt.h with
include/linux/interrupt.h
We have <linux/interrupt.h> and "interrupt.h".
x86 calls these things irq.c and irq.h, perhaps that would be a little
better.
There's also include/linux/irq.h
There is precedence in x86 for some of the names though.
But really why churn up the code in the first place? the kvm_mips prefix
does tell us exactly what we are dealing with.
That's why people created the arch/mips/kvm directory, isn't it?
Deng-Cheng
