On 20/05/14 18:52, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 05/20/2014 02:20 PM, James Hogan wrote: >> I don't know what Pekka's policy is for kvm tools, but to avoid >> confusion I'd like to make clear that this patchset depends on a KVM >> implementation (KVM_VM_TYPE==1 for VZ) which hasn't been accepted into >> the mainline kernel yet. > > Is that something that is likely to end up in mainline Linux in one form > or another? If yes, we can merge early like we did with arm64. Very likely yes, and most of the specifics of the MIPS KVM API have already been pinned down for the trap & emulate KVM support which is in mainline. Cheers James
