[Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo
