RE: [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Make clocksource register functions void

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk
> On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> > And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> > return value.
> ......
> > -static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32 hz)
> > +static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32 hz)
> >   {
> >   	return __clocksource_register_scale(cs, 1, hz);
> >   }
> 
> This doesn't make sense - you are still returning a value on a function
> declared void, and the return is now from a function that doesn't return
> anything either ?!?!
> Doesn't this throw a compile-time warning??

It depends on the compiler.
Recent gcc allow it.
I don't know if it is actually valid C though.

There is no excuse for it on lines like the above though.

	David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux