Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:11:29 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52D52796.3030509@phrozen.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:03:34PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,

Wolfram, please...

> should we take 1/7 and 6/7 via the mips tree ?

> > Should go via subsystem tree

Yes :)

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
  - From: John Crispin

References:
- [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
  - From: John Crispin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
Next by Date: [PATCH] ssb: gpio: use #if instead of "if" for IS_ENABLED
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/mips/lantiq/xway: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux