On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:08:43 +0000 Psychedelic Squid <psquid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2 Jan 2014 23:02, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:56:29 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > Robert Graffham <psquid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > + singleprocessor machines. On a singleprocessor machine, the > kernel > > > > > > "singleprocessor" looks wrong without a hyphen. How about > "uniprocessor"? > > > > > > > Yes please. > > > > Also the patch should have a signed-off-by:, as per > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 12, please. > > > > The signed-off-by: is already there. ah, it was appended after the patch. Don't do that ;) > I'll get the other changes for the > revised patch ready shortly, thanks. Also, newbie submitter and l couldn't > find this in the documentation at a quick glance: should I submit it as a > new thread, or a continuation of this? Either is OK. I tend to prefer continuation-of-this, mainly because it prevents people from forgetting to cc people who were involved in earlier discussion. (Of course, if the discussion graph was complex, no reply-to-all will capture all participants. Nobody bothers to go through the discussion gathering the names of all participants so I often end up doing this when putting the final patch together)
