Re: [PATCH 12/18] MIPS: Netlogic: XLP9XX UART offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:35:06PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> On 21/12/13 12:22, Jayachandran C wrote:
> >Update IO offset of the early console UART.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C<jchandra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >  arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/uart.h |    3 ++-
> >  arch/mips/netlogic/common/earlycons.c         |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/uart.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/uart.h
> >index 86d16e1..a6c5442 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/uart.h
> >+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/uart.h
> >@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@
> >  #define nlm_read_uart_reg(b, r)		nlm_read_reg(b, r)
> >  #define nlm_write_uart_reg(b, r, v)	nlm_write_reg(b, r, v)
> >  #define nlm_get_uart_pcibase(node, inst)	\
> >-		nlm_pcicfg_base(XLP_IO_UART_OFFSET(node, inst))
> >+	nlm_pcicfg_base(cpu_is_xlp9xx() ?  XLP9XX_IO_UART_OFFSET(node) : \
> >+						XLP_IO_UART_OFFSET(node, inst))
> 
> nitpick: i think this looks really ugly. maybe move the ()?():()
> logic to a define ?

Since it is already inside a macro, I would say that the improvement is minor.
This is the also the same pattern we have used in all include/asm/xlp-hal/ files,
I cannot change it in just one place.

JC.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux