On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 07:52:04PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > I think the discussion was off-list (Ralf, would you mind if I digged up > any clues from there?). Please go ahead. > The format has been set long ago, and is also odd > enough to have 32 64-bit slots in the PTRACE_GETFPREGS/PTRACE_SETFPREGS > structure even for o32 processes (that now should be unexpectedly helpful > for FP64 o32 processes though), so there's little sense discussing its > prettiness or ugliness at this point in the game. > > Also I'm not sure what the core file format is for the FP context, it may > be worth double-checking too. Is there some test suite for that kind of stuff? > Please feel free to poke me directly if you have any further issues about > MIPS I ISA compatibility. Makes me wonder if there's a MIPS emulator that emulates a MIPS I system faithfully. Ralf
