Am 26.09.2013 18:06, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> And, of course, this makes your patch valid.
>> Can you also please ensure that your new defconfigs are minimal?
>
> Yeah, it's close to a minimal configuration for the 3.10 kernel
> (latest at the time of patch submission). I was aiming to minimize the
> diff between the current defconfig and the two new defconfigs in
> configs/. The slim diffstat does the talking:
>
> arch/um/Kconfig.common | 5 -
> arch/um/Makefile | 11 ++
> arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} | 209 +++++++++++++-------
> arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} | 250 +++++++++++++++---------
> arch/x86/um/Kconfig | 5 +
> 5 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
> copy arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} (86%)
> rename arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} (83%)
>
> If we find some deficiencies, we can always update it. For now, please
> commit these two patches.
Please resend them with savedefconfig applied.
There is no need to have three commits for that.
Thanks,
//richard
