On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error code to
> be propagated. This will be used in subsequent patches to allow further
> propagation of error codes.
>
> The interrupt number corresponding to the new mapping is returned in an
> output parameter so that the return value is reserved to signal success
> (== 0) or failure (< 0).
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
One comment below, otherwise:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 905a24b..ae71b14 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static int pci_read_irq_line(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> {
> struct of_irq oirq;
> unsigned int virq;
> + int ret;
>
> pr_debug("PCI: Try to map irq for %s...\n", pci_name(pci_dev));
>
> @@ -266,8 +267,10 @@ static int pci_read_irq_line(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> oirq.size, oirq.specifier[0], oirq.specifier[1],
> of_node_full_name(oirq.controller));
>
> - virq = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
> - oirq.size);
> + ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
> + oirq.size, &virq);
> + if (ret)
> + virq = NO_IRQ;
> }
> if(virq == NO_IRQ) {
> pr_debug(" Failed to map !\n");
Can you get rid of NO_IRQ usage here instead of adding to it.
Rob
