On 08/23/2013 11:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
+static void clk_nodrv_disable_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(1);
Ideally we shouldn't get here, but if we do I guess it could be very
noisy. How about WARN_ONCE?
Yes, I guess that would be much better. I could resend it tomorrow if
needed.
After you address Russell's comments in patch #1 I will be happy to take
this series.
I have posted today v3 addressing Russell's comments. Hopefully patch #3
(the patches got reordered) looks OK now. v3 includes actual assigning
of clk->owner I somehow managed to miss in previous series :/ Please have
a look at it.
--
Regards,
Sylwester