On 08/05/2013 06:43 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:21:57PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:17:01PM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
On 01/08/13 21:22, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
No code changes, just reflowing some comments and consistently using
tabs and spaces. Object code is verified to be unchanged.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ /* Put the saved pointer to vcpu (s1) back into the DDATA_LO Register */
git am detects a whitespace error here ("space before tab in indent").
It's got spaces before and after the tab actually.
/* load the guest context from VCPU and return */
this comment could have it's indentation fixed too
Otherwise, for all 3 patches:
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm happy with the patch series as well and will fix this issue when
applying the patch.
kvm fixes usually go through kvm.git tree for all arches. Any special
reasons you want to get those through mips tree?
I don't really care which tree takes this particular patch set.
However, in the near future, I will be sending revised versions of
patches needed by MIPS/KVM that are in files outside of the
arch/mips/kvm directory and it is possible that those may suffer patch
ordering problems if merged through a 'foreign tree'.
In any event, there is the problem with the whitespace error in the
comment. I blame checkpatch.pl for not flagging it, but that is not
really a good excuse. If it goes by the KVM tree, do you want me to
send a corrected patch? Or can you fix it when you merge it.
David Daney
