Re: [PATCH] mips/ftrace: Fix function tracing return address to match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/18/2013 01:11 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 15:17 -0700, David Daney wrote:
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx>

Dynamic function tracing was not working on MIPS.  When doing dynamic
tracing, the tracer attempts to match up the passed in address with
the one the compiler creates in the mcount tables.  The MIPS code was
passing in the return address from the tracing function call, but the
compiler tables were the address of the function call.  So they
wouldn't match.

Just subtracting 8 from the return address will give the address of
the function call.  Easy enough.

Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx>
[david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx: Adjusted code comment and patch Subject.]
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S b/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
index a03e93c..539b629 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ _mcount:
  	PTR_S	MCOUNT_RA_ADDRESS_REG, PT_R12(sp)
  #endif

-	move	a0, ra		/* arg1: self return address */
+	PTR_SUBU a0, ra, 8	/* arg1: self address */
  	.globl ftrace_call
  ftrace_call:
  	nop	/* a placeholder for the call to a real tracing function */

I applied this patch to my Yeeloong Lemote laptop and it causes the
system to crash. Not sure why. I'll try to investigate.


There is an mcount ABI difference based on which GCC version you are using, although I wouldn't think it would effect this bit.

We are using GCC-4.7 FWIW.

David Daney


-- Steve







[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux